The Folly
of Nostalgia and Remembrance
What
is reality? Philosophers have been mentally masturbating over this
concept from arguably the birth of language. As we became more
self-aware probably around 50,000 years ago, as testament to cave
paintings as a means of expression of thought and emotion, one of the
fundamental questions arose: is that salacious feeling lust or love?
I am confident that our Cro-Magnon
brethren
didn't exactly theorize it that way and more than likely dismissed it
as irrelevant. Nonetheless, we can ask ourselves now; is the
perception of love, true love, worse when it is perceived as genuine
but ultimately not real? Or did that event happen as my churning
cortex is allowing me to logically understand? Perhaps the reality is
a element of the perception which is in turn the belief? Regardless,
the intricacies of detail found in memories we are privy to now are
part and parcel to the universal human emotional expression.
Remembrance is the mosaic formed by placing the tiles of memories
into a pattern. The pattern is unique and random and highly personal.
But what if those memories are perceived ironically or falsely; how
does that change the entire mosaic? Lies and delusions are the same
as memories if we perceive them as genuine. Whatever the
psychological nomenclature is either false memory, implanted memory
or secondary memory they all share the same essence in quality. Going
further on leap of logic these memories could be fueled by benign
hallucinations which are out of our control yet mimic our perception.
Vast oceans of remembrance keeping your “soul” alive by a linkage
of memories dotting the seascape like an expansive archipelago.
The
future as we had envisioned it years ago; does it live up to our
expectations? Have we merely adapted to it through mild hallucinatory
episodes making the disappointment more palatable? Like a jaunt
down memory lane with all the jagged cobblestones of perception along
the way. Imagine, if you will, the political climate as the
Republicans see it. Ronald Reagan is exalted as the messiah and an
embodiment of all that is righteous and holy within the
neo-conservative movement. Is he really? Conversely, take JFK. He is
viewed by liberals and progressives as the template of Pragmatism.
Pragmatism is a chiefly American philosophy which in a nutshell
decrees that one should weigh the pros and cons and in the end choose
what works. Is that a real and bona fide assessment of JFK? The
negation of of hurts and disappointments after a romance breaks up.
Are you coping in the short term only to emerge with a more balanced
and less rapacious overview of the relationship or have you subjected
yourself to false memories? The past is never as great as the
delusion would have us believe. It was never a carnival of utopian
delights. But what if we imagined it to be so by crisscrossing the
way we perceive emotions. The crisscrossing and intermingling of
perception is known to neuroscience as synesthesia.
Synesthesia
has distinctive and predictable hyper-connectivity which once formed
early in life is unlikely to change as the individual ages. Perhaps
the most common cross wiring is color synesthesia which shades,
colors or tints numbers and letters. Despite the personalization of
the experience data dictates that the letter A is usually red among
synesthetes. This trend holds true for the other types of synesthesia
as well. Another form of number synesthesia is spatial sequencing in
which numbers appear in the minds eye to occupy disparate slots in an
imagined area. The number 7 could hoover close to the face around the
eyes while the number 3 might be teetering on the edge of the
horizon. Sound synesthesia orchestrates a visual orgy of colored
fireworks which burst in front of the synesthete as notes, melodies
and harmonies are played. Words can also spark sensation on the
tongue of rudimentary tastes in what is called lexical synesthesia.
The taste sensation is brought forth out of phonemes. A diphthong
might create honey sweetness or a hard X might taste harsh and
bitter. Who knows maybe even the passionately languid /I/ /L/ /O/ /V
E/ /Y/ /OU/ might start with a wash of cane sugar and finish with an
unbearable tartness.
If
you come to the conclusion, after reading just a smidgen about
synesthesia, that you are far removed from its cross wired confusion;
think again. Statistically the prevalence in the US alone is mind
boggling. One in twenty three people have some degree of at least one
sort of clinical synesthesia. This statistic alone should make us
recoil and reassess. Naturally we are painfully and gleefully
vigilant of the axiom “lies, damn lies and statistics”
popularized by Mark Twain in his autobiography published in 1906.
Interesting side note is that Twain was not the first to use the
phrase in print. When speaking about “three different truths”
that honor goes to Eliza Gutch. In 1891 Gutch wrote an open letter to
The National Observer in London which was published under her
pseudonym St Swithin. Let me swerve back on topic. Hopefully this
intermezzo has given you enough time to absorb the gravity of the
apparent yet unclear intrinsic evolutionary advantage synesthesia
provides. Extracting synesthesia from physiological and clinical
constrains and shining a light on its linguistic omnipotence it
becomes, I posit, even more an integral part of all of us. Here's an
experiment to test on yourself. Without pondering and overanalyzing
try envisioning a Hawaiian/aloha shirt with dancing hula girls, tiki
statues and pineapple motifs in red, green, blue and yellow. Ok, keep
thinking of that Aloha shirt and all its motion of color and motifs.
If you are like me the shirt you are thinking of it shouting like a
Banshee at you retinas. You might describe it to someone as a “loud
shirt'. A simple metaphor to sketch a picture for someone in order to
elicit the same emotional experience when you see that horrendous
Aloha Shirt. I, by the way, adore Hawaiian shirts and this fictitious
shirt I would buy in a New York minute. If we distill a metaphor down
to its basal functionality then we can understand it as giving
meaning to a concept by juxtaposing the similar with the dissimilar.
Good news for poets and greeting card manufacturers is that the list
of combinations is virtually endless; warm color, sharp cheese or
she's so sweet are a few which spring to mind. To illustrate the
hyper-connectivity more concisely it can be assumed that synesthesia
is working surreptitiously when we experience taste. At its core the
sensation of taste is extremely limited having a range of only 5
flavors: sweet, bitter, sour, salty or umami (Japanese for
meaty/savory). Our ability to nuance smells and complex aromas
permits our rudimentary tastebuds to be hoaxed into a broader
spectrum of taste. So we all employ some form of cross wiring which I
feel is linked closely to synesthesia.
The
experience of phantom limbs could logically, if not physiologically,
tickle the neurotransmitters which evoke emotions. Phantom limbs are
defined as a sensation of an amputated limb still having the
properties it had while it was attached to the body. It move and
gyrates and can even be an nuisance like a physical limb can
sometimes be. I recall Oliver Sacks, the renowned neurologist,
describing a patient of his who had recently become an amputee losing
his arm from the elbow down. He complained to the nurses, doctors and
hospital staff that he found it vexing that he kept poking his eye
with his missing finger from the amputated arm. Emotions might have a
similar mechanism in our limbic system; the system located in our
brain which controls and regulates emotions. The nearly catatonic
respites one takes when grieving about the loss of a loved one;
either by death or separation; could trigger a secondary almost
hallucinogenic memory. I opine that the complete array of senses can
be utilized to conjure these phantasmagorical memories. The nostalgic
scent of a person; the aroma of their unique chemical secretions;
build a memory tower tantamount to the Tower of Babel. The
idiosyncratic nature of olfactory perception pushes the heights of
this nostalgia to the precipice of spiritual awakening. Everyone has
had uttered at sometime or another the synesthetic phrases; “It's
so real I can almost taste (touch, smell, see, hear) it”. Memory
becomes not only subjective but extremely specific when the
remembrance of emotions is summoned to tranquilize a loss,
disappointment or painful experience.
What
about nostalgia of the future. Why do we aggressively want to believe
that progress equals bliss? I can't ever remembering I wanted a
jetpack or flying car or domed city with connective tubes wending
around the metropolis. Never thought I'd buy a home in the Apex
Suburbs of equatorial Mars. Futurists and scientists who only
extrapolate from what they know currently would have us buy into
their beguiling vision of existence along side nano quantum computers
all the way to designer babies and singularity. Millenarian movements
are another category of like minded people which declare the world
will end soon. Expecting it to transform into something revolutionary
the millenarians have twisted a theme which has coalesced neatly into
the singularity movement. Death takes on a hyperbolic reality to us
fleshy humans as we are systematically ushered through a series of
evolutionary changes. First cyborgs then hybrids finally reaching a
state of genome tweaked super beings. Or some other variation or
sequence. Why not reverse that thought and throw it back on itself.
The futuristic predictions are merely filling the gaps and voids of
nostalgic expectations. These predictions for the future are derived
from the prevailing zeitgeist, but usually reveal aspects of what we
had hoped our future would look like.
Remembrance
and nostalgia are among our finest gadgets in the toolbox of our
brain. The terms real, unreal or surreal are each bankrupt as
classifications for the vast and rich experiences we use to make life
a little more worth living.
Does Heston Blumenthal use the rules of synesthesia when he prepares his new frog legs dish?
ReplyDeleteDoes the frog mind the phantom pain? Does he enjoy the phantom taste?