Tedx Poynter: The Future of Journalism
(story originally ran in
Creative Loafing Tampa)
The future of journalism was the connecting theme of a version of the popular online Ted Talks series last Friday at the
Poynter Institute
in downtown Saint Petersburg. A crowd of mostly media insiders listened
to topics ranging from copyright issues and viral media to fact
checking and the role of new media.
The Poynter Institute is borrowing a style of discourse from the successful
Ted Talks
which focus on disseminating new ideas on three varied subject matters;
Technology, Entertainment Design. The TedX formats are independently
organized but are conducting within the Ted Talks structure. The Poynter
Institute is a non-profit school of journalism, which teaches through
traditional class room settings as well as online webinars. Elynn
Angelotti is a social media faculty member at the Poynter Institute. She
said the blueprint used by Ted Talks is a good fit for Poynter’s third
Ted X event.
“What they’ve done is provide us with a framework to create powerful
engaging; much briefer talks than we typically do here at Poynter. So,
it’s a deferent tempo. It’s a different style. But it’s an engaging
platform that helps us invite the Tampa Bay community and the larger
journalism community into an event where we can realty learn from
innovative thinkers.”
One of the overarching topics discussed during the event
by several of the speakers was the role of professional journalism.
Since the second dot com boom which was fueled by the near hegemonic
emergence of social media, news and scholarly media have experienced a
decline in hardcopy circulation. This decline brought with it a steady
decline in revenue from advertising. In order to compensate some
traditional media outlets have adopted a new business model called
“paywall”. A “paywall” is an online business model which restricts
access to webpage content without a paid subscription to news or
academic publications. Paywalls come in two varieties either “hard”
where no or limited viewing is permitted or “soft” where the content is
less rigidly controlled.
One staff member who focuses on ethics in the media, Kelly McBride
said in an interview after the talk, a well informed citizenry is a
cornerstone to democracy. The direction of journalism McBride sees,
however, is a move towards unprofessionalism: citizens with a passion,
spokes people; marketeers. She says we are still tumbling down the
rabbit hole with no clear indication where will it end. According to
McBride democracy needs at least a small cadre of journalist in order to
function. A la carte journalism works for some models, like Side Boob
Reports, but doesn't work for investigative journalism. She said that
not many people are willing to pay for investigative stories.
That would seem to be the case with stories like the
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists
who divulged the path to the center of the money maze that stems from
lucrative offshore banking. However, paywalls are beginning to work for
the New York Times and other major newspapers, like
Gannett Publishing but the future is murky for small town newspapers where it's largely untested whether people will pay at all.
Transmitting and receiving news and information outside the
conventional written word is a viable means of ensuring professionalism
and reliability. Pat Aufderheide is a professor and director of the
Center for Social Media at American University and also a film critic. Aufderheide said documentaries are an important and significant medium for reporting on culture.
”Homes across America through public broadcasting these films are
being seen by millions and millions of people; which is at least two or
three orders of magnitude larger than anything that will happen to a
documentary on theatrical screens. So although they are not necessarily
sexy in movie media they are terrifically important in being part of our
media mix for a democracy.”
A Ted Talks veteran, Eli Pariser, spoke about the misconceptions of viral media. Pariser’s most recent project is
upworthy.com but he cut his internet teeth with the
moveon.org
website. Pariser said the way information is filtered today is a
challenge because we have little control over how it is filtered, what
is filtered or the methodology behind the filtering. I order to achieve
what he calls a “nourishing diet of information” filters need to be
smarter.
“FaceBook for example, could have an important button to go along
with the like button and that would actually have a significant effect.
Right? Because it’s hard to click like on war in Afghanistan continues
for twelfth year. But you would say that’ important; I want people to
pay attention to that. So there are ways without being prescriptive
about what’s important and what’s not that you could allow people to
elevate that kind of content.”
When asked about the emerging trends in social media as it pertains
to news and information gathering, Pariser sees an increased
fragmentation as the overall trend over the next five years. He said we
“...are all increasingly speaking these different informational
languages.” Will these internet fragments eventually be integrated?
Maybe not Pariser thinks. He doesn't foresee these information Goliaths
being slain by any upstart dot com Davids.
Facebook, Twitter and Google as well as Instagram and Tumblr are not
only veritable blue chip companies but they are the forums and platforms
on which disparate niches of society have come to rely as a primary
mode of communication. It's been said that President Obama's social
media “gladhanding” was in large part the element which tipped the
scales in his favor during the
2012 presidential election much like the role social media played as an instrument in nurturing the
Arab Spring into a regional phenomenon.
Other media experts at the Ted X Poynter event also talked about the
changing tides of journalism as a result of expanding technology. There
aren't any mystic Oracles to consult on the future of journalism but one
thing is certain, the medium is becoming the message. It's the duel
responsibility of the consumer and the producer to make sure the
message remains meaningful despite the medium.
